News

Other articles

Monday 8 March 2010
Audio Podcast  Web 2.0 and Social Networks in the Enterprise

Sunday 7 March 2010
Article  Digital Economy Bill raises privacy concerns

Wednesday 3 March 2010
Article  Cloud security threats identified by CSA

Tuesday 2 March 2010
In Brief  Vote for your CSO Interchange topics

Thursday 25 February 2010
Article  Cloud Computing : a simple question of supplier risk

Monday 22 February 2010
Article  Most dangerous coding errors outed

Monday 22 February 2010
In Brief  Microsoft IE users to get browser choice update

Friday 19 February 2010
Article  Google Buzz fail highlights privacy expectation rise

Thursday 18 February 2010
In Brief  Annual hacking challenge aims for mobiles and browsers

Wednesday 17 February 2010
Audio Podcast  The Challenges of Cross Border eID

Monday 15 February 2010
Audio Podcast  The Readiness of eID in Europe Part 2

Sunday 14 February 2010
Audio Podcast  The Readiness of eID in Europe Part 1

Thursday 11 February 2010
Article  Concern at DDoS sophistication rise

Monday 8 February 2010
Article  Voice encryption standard takes a beating

Friday 5 February 2010
Article  Military importance of cyber recognised

Another nail in the Signature AV coffin?

So, are signatures dead or what ?
Written by Mark Mayne (SecurityVibes)
Published on Friday 30 October 2009
0 comment(s) | Subnetwork United Kingdom
 

Anti-malware software tools that rely on signature files to detect infections are set to be increasingly ineffective as internet traffic volumes rise, according to experts.

Dr Godfrey Gaston, CSIT Director, said: “One of the projects we’re working on is very high-volume internet Deep Packet Inspection. Current anti-virus security software is mostly signature-based, which simply can’t handle high volumes of traffic, such as in streaming applications or IPTV situations, for example. We need to move in the direction of hardware solutions.”

Most major security suites integrate a signature-based scanning engine, as well as heuristic detection tools. The responsive nature of signature detection makes it ineffective against zero-day threats, and polymorphic/metamorphic botnet malware which is becoming increasingly common.

David Harley, ESET Director of Malware Intelligence, said: “The signature approach isn’t entirely dead, and never will be from the perspective of an effective cleanup after the event. However, it’s very time and resource intensive, and isn’t very flexible or fast when dealing with large traffic volumes. There’s a huge amount of effort going into cloud-based technologies that show great promise here.”

It has been revealed that malware-related click fraud is at an all time high, according to a study from Click Forensics. In Q3 this year, 42.6 per cent of fraudulent clacks were from botnets, compared with 27.6 percent in the same period of 2008. Although click fraud itself is not a new phenomenon, recently-discovered botnets such as Bahama specialise in the scam.

However, Harley sounded a note of warning: “The real problem is that there is this continuing perception that malware is a purely technical problem, but there’s no security product on the market that can’t be bypassed in some way by attackers who think they are immune from prosecution. Education is the key.”

Our members have posted 0 comments about this article. Only members can view and submit new comments.
Related contents
Advertising
Related Questions & Answers
Companies
Most commented
Most Popular
+
 
Related companies
F-secure
Read members opinions and rate F-secure too !
Ratings  0
Eset
Read members opinions and rate Eset too !
Ratings  0
G Data Software Ag
Read members opinions and rate G Data Software Ag too !
Ratings  0
Securityvibes.com (9 fans)
Read members opinions and rate Securityvibes.com too !
Ratings  0
Loglogic (1 fans)
Read members opinions and rate Loglogic too !
Ratings  0
Search
Our RSS Feeds
Subscribe to our RSS feeds for free !
Social Web