News

Other articles

Sunday 14 March 2010
Article  Cloud security assessment scheme launched

Sunday 14 March 2010
In Brief  Human element undermines encryption

Thursday 11 March 2010
Article  Digital privacy framework steps closer?

Monday 8 March 2010
Audio Podcast  Web 2.0 and Social Networks in the Enterprise

Sunday 7 March 2010
Article  Digital Economy Bill raises privacy concerns

Wednesday 3 March 2010
Article  Cloud security threats identified by CSA

Tuesday 2 March 2010
In Brief  Vote for your CSO Interchange topics

Thursday 25 February 2010
Article  Cloud Computing : a simple question of supplier risk

Monday 22 February 2010
Article  Most dangerous coding errors outed

Monday 22 February 2010
In Brief  Microsoft IE users to get browser choice update

Friday 19 February 2010
Article  Google Buzz fail highlights privacy expectation rise

Thursday 18 February 2010
In Brief  Annual hacking challenge aims for mobiles and browsers

Wednesday 17 February 2010
Audio Podcast  The Challenges of Cross Border eID

Monday 15 February 2010
Audio Podcast  The Readiness of eID in Europe Part 2

Sunday 14 February 2010
Audio Podcast  The Readiness of eID in Europe Part 1

Searching Questions to Assess the Quality of Security Products

Cowboy Security Vendors Should Beware
Written by Ben Chai (SecurityVibes.com)
Published on Tuesday 19 May 2009
2 comment(s) | Subnetwork United Kingdom
 

The Jericho Forum will soon launch a comprehensive assessment questionnaire to help purchasers see through the marketing and sales speak of security vendors and accurately assess the quality of the vendors' products.

An exclusive interview with Security Vibes, Paul Simmonds, Board Member of the Jericho Forum and Global IS Integrated Assurance Director for Astra Zeneca, revealed that the Jericho Forum is soon to release a set of nasty questions to ask security vendors. These nasty questions will enable purchasers of security products to be able to quickly see through the marketing and sales speak of security vendors and help to assess exactly how secure and useful the vendor's products actually are.  According to Paul Simmonds,

"...we've been working for a number of months now on taking the eleven commandments and turning them into a self assessment process that can be used two fold, one by the vendors so the vendor hopefully will self assess their product and as part of a request for quote process will come in and say here's my Jericho Forum self assessment summary of how ready my product is but conversely we're hoping that middle managers and the smaller companies out there who haven't been intimately involved in de-perimiterisation, we're giving them a ready list of nasty questions to ask the vendors as part of their buying process.”


The questionnaire is based on the Jericho Forum's Eleven Commandments for working securely in a de-perimeterised security architecture which many companies have been using as a basis for use with their RFP (Request for Proposal). The questionnaire will have several benefits and impact. In terms of benefits, having a ready made checklist of questions:

  • will help companies unfamiliar with de-perimeterisation to know the right questions to ask security vendors
  • will ensure compliance with the eleven commandments of secure de-perimeterisation
  • will cut through the marketing hype and ensure thoroughness of assessment of a security product from a vendor

The long term impact will be that the strength of security products will be raised and that vendors themselves will use the questionnaire as a checklist to ensure that their own products are secure before launching for general usage.

Paul Simmonds gave us an example of one of the nasty questions to ask and how to rate the vendor's product based on one of the eleven commandments which essentially says that

Devices and applications must communicate using open, inherently secure protocols (the security solutions for the Jericho architecture for de-perimeterisation have to be based on open standards and protocols that are widely accepted). For example you should be using SFTP for security instead of FTP

The example question for a GOOD rating says out of the box are you using only secure protocols?

The example questions for an EXCELLENT rating says out of the box are you using secure protocols plus are they documented and if you give the option to downgrade the security have you fully documented the pros and cons for downgrading the security.

As Paul Simmonds said in the interview, “Hopefully it will sort out the cowboys from the vendors with genuine product”.

The list will be freely available some time towards the end of May/June from the Jericho Forum site.

- Click here to view the full interview at Security Vibes

Our members have posted 2 comments about this article. Only members can view and submit new comments.
Related contents
Advertising
Related Questions & Answers
Companies
Most commented
Most Popular
+
 
Related companies
Securityvibes.com (9 fans)
Read members opinions and rate Securityvibes.com too !
Ratings  0
Loglogic (1 fans)
Read members opinions and rate Loglogic too !
Ratings  0
Hermitage Solutions
Read members opinions and rate Hermitage Solutions too !
Ratings  0
Beeware (2 fans)
Read members opinions and rate Beeware too !
Ratings  0
Trend Micro
Read members opinions and rate Trend Micro too !
Ratings  0
Search
Our RSS Feeds
Subscribe to our RSS feeds for free !
Social Web